o3n [ozone] blockchain layer

Blockchain source

Menu
  • Cybersecurity services
Menu

Chinese Arbitrator Reaffirms That Bitcoin Can Be Held, Privately Transferred as Property

Posted on October 26, 2018 by nbelov

A Chinese arbitration court has ruled that “there is no law or regulation that explicitly prohibits parties from holding bitcoin or private transactions in bitcoin.”

An arbitration body in China has ruled that cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC) are legally protected as property, in a case published Oct. 25 via the arbitrator’s WeChat account.

The Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration ruled in favor of an unnamed plaintiff in an equity transfer dispute, in which the defendant failed to return holdings of Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Bitcoin Diamond (BCD) as had been agreed upon in a contractual agreement.

According to the case outline, the contract had authorized the defendant to trade and manage the plaintiff’s portfolio of 20.13 BTC, 50 BCH, and 12.66 BCD for a stipulated time. When the defendant failed to return the holdings as per the agreed schedule, the plaintiff brought the case before the arbitrator, seeking the return of his assets with interest.

The defense had attempted to argue that the contractual equity transfer agreement was invalid, pointing to the fact that cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in China, and that their circulation is subject to severe restrictions in the country.

The defendant cited the central bank’s Announcement on Preventing Financial Risks from Initial Coin Offerings (ICO), which was passed in Sept. 2017, stating that ICOs that raise “so-called virtual currencies” such as BTC and Ethereum (ETH) “through the irregular sale and circulation of tokens” are engaging in “unauthorized” public financing, which is “illegal.”

The central bank had also determined that crypto “cannot and should not be circulated nor used in the market as currency.”

The defendant claimed that the core “payment and arrangement of the transfer price” clause of the contract was thus in violation of the mandatory provisions of Chinese law, which prohibits the sale and circulation of crypto tokens, as well as the trading platforms used as a venue for their transfer and exchange.

The arbitrator however found that the contractual obligation under dispute did not fall under the relevant provisions as outlined in the Sept. 2017 prohibition, stating that:

“There is no law or regulation that explicitly prohibits parties from holding bitcoin or private transactions in bitcoin, [only warnings to] the public about the investment risks. The contract in this case stipulates the obligation to return the bitcoin between two natural persons, and does not belong to the [Sept. 2017 ban].”

The arbitrator thus concluded that the contract was legally binding, adding that:

“Bitcoin has the nature of a property, which can be owned and controlled by parties, and is able to provide economic values and benefits.”

The arbitrator refuted that restrictions on exchanges pose an obstacle, noting that private crypto transfers face no technical difficulties as long as both parties have a unique wallet address.

The ruling thus ordered the defendant to uphold his contractual obligations and return the assets under dispute with interest (calculated by the arbitrator as being worth $493,158.40), as well as to pay a penalty of 100,000 yuan ($14,400).  

This June, a Shanghai court similarly ruled in favor of an ICO operator in the context of an unjust enrichment civil dispute case. Similarly denying the applicability of the Sept. 2017 ban, the court deemed that Ethereum (ETH) is protected under China’s property law, as long as the plaintiff can provide proof a digital chain of custody to the court.

This September, China’s Supreme Court ruled that evidence authenticated with blockchain technology is binding in legal disputes.

Source: Cointelegraph https://cointelegraph.com/

Recent Posts

  • Self-custody is key during extreme market conditions: Here's what experts say July 1, 2022
  • PYMNTS Intelligence: The Promise of Faster Transactions Using Blockchain Technology – PYMNTS.com July 1, 2022
  • Layer-1 blockchains: How crypto winter could slow the challenge to Ethereum – Cointelegraph July 1, 2022
  • Blockchain in Education Market Expected to Witness a Sustainable Growth Over 2029 | Sony Global Education, odem.ioÂ, Open Source University – Designer Women – Designer Women July 1, 2022
  • Ripple: Government of Colombia Set to Utilize XRPL Blockchain for Land Registry – U.Today July 1, 2022
  • Blockchain Identity Management Market 2022-2028: Featuring Key Players Amazon Web Services Inc., Microsoft, IBM & Others – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire July 1, 2022
  • Deutsche Bank analysts see Bitcoin recovering to $28K by December July 1, 2022
  • $23.3 Billion Global Web 3.0 Blockchain Market Growth with GAGR of 41.6% 2022-2028 | The Benefits such as Improved Privacy & Secure Network Driving the Market – GlobeNewswire July 1, 2022
  • Blockchain Bites: A$DC used in Carbon Credit purchase; Three Arrows to be liquidated in BVI; Laying the first blocks of US crypto regulatory reform; Hong Kong to licence VASPs and regulate market conduct – Lexology July 1, 2022
  • Minima's cooperative Blockchain network reaches 120000 complete nodes – IBS Intelligence July 1, 2022
  • 'Global Economy Can Be Fixed By Digital Transformation And Blockchain Technology' – Entrepreneur July 1, 2022
  • Global Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Market Report 2022-2027: Rising Application of Blockchain in Healthcare Claims and Billing Driving Growth – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire July 1, 2022
  • Laura K. Inamedinova on Maximizing Press for Blockchain Projects – Crypto Mode July 1, 2022
  • Coinbase denies reports of selling customer data to the US government July 1, 2022
  • Not giving up: VanEck refiles with SEC for spot Bitcoin ETF July 1, 2022
  • Bitcoin price: June close barely beats 2017 high as Coinbase Premium flips positive July 1, 2022
  • Key Takeaways | Crypto, Smart Contracts and Blockchain—Execution and Innovation – Lexology July 1, 2022
  • MakerDAO members shoot down proposal for more centralization July 1, 2022
  • OwlTing enlists Dow Jones database to enhance blockchain transaction security – DIGITIMES July 1, 2022
  • Multisigs mean funds in bridges are 'one small slipup' from being hacked July 1, 2022
  • Hundreds of Bored Ape owners sign up to hire out their NFTs to brands July 1, 2022
  • Better days ahead with crypto deleveraging coming to an end: JPMorgan July 1, 2022
  • Ethereum fork a success as Sepolia testnet gears up to trial the Merge July 1, 2022
  • Worst quarter in 11 years as Bitcoin price and activity plunges July 1, 2022
  • Societe Generale – FORGE selects METACO to manage blockchain asset capabilities – CryptoNinjas July 1, 2022
  • BnkToTheFuture unveils 3 proposals to rescue Celsius from oblivion July 1, 2022
  • EU agrees on MiCA regulation to crack down on crypto and stablecoins July 1, 2022
  • Kalima – A new way to collect, protect and monetize data using Blockchain for IoT – CryptoNinjas July 1, 2022
  • FTX Abandoned Discussions to Celsius Network Acquisition – Report – Blockchain.News July 1, 2022
  • Xinghuo BIF and Zetrix Jointly Introduce Web3 Services: Blockchain Identity/Verifiable Credentials and Contract Signing – GlobeNewswire July 1, 2022

Ad

Ad

©2022 o3n [ozone] blockchain layer | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com