o3n [ozone] blockchain layer

Blockchain source

Menu
  • Cybersecurity services
Menu

Poloniex ‘Last Resort’ Trade Reversals Necessary to Safeguard Trader Funds

Posted on February 19, 2020 by nbelov

Cryptocurrency exchange Poloniex confirms that no users lost funds or holdings after a bug forced the platform to reverse trades on Feb. 12.

Cryptocurrency exchange Poloniex remains confident that it has identified and fixed an error that caused a number of erroneous trades on the platform earlier this week. On Feb. 12, Poloniex made a decision to reverse all trades that took place during an 11-minute period due to a software error. The bug caused trades to be executed and accounted for inaccurately.

The platform’s automated audit system picked up the affected trades and halted all withdrawals. Following that, the Poloniex team effectively reversed every trade that had been executed as a result of the bug.

The main reason for the reversal, which copped criticism from all corners of the cryptocurrency community, was due to the sheer number of trades that were affected by the software error. Cointelegraph reached out to Poloniex for an official comment on the situation as well as the users to find out how they were affected.

Trade reversal a “last resort”

Arianne Daniel, a product marketing manager at Poloniex, told Cointelegraph that the exchange was able to identify and correct the issue that had caused the error once the platform had shut down for maintenance. While all the trades during the affected period were completely reversed, Daniel explained that none of the affected traders lost any funds or holdings:

“No customers lost funds as a result of the error. As the error only occurred for customers who placed or executed an order with a clientorderid set during the 11 minutes before we placed our site into maintenance mode, only a very small percentage of our daily active traders were affected by the issue.”

The exchange maintains that it had explored all possible options to rectify the trading errors caused by the bug, and it had to turn to a “last resort” by reversing trades. According to Daniel:

“We understand how serious it is to reverse trades and view it as a last resort. Unfortunately, we had to turn to this for the first time, as the error affected too many trades to correct manually.”

It is difficult to ascertain what the best course of action would have been in a scenario like this in comparison with other cryptocurrencies exchanges. Poloniex deemed the reversal to be the most appropriate course, and Daniel says Poloniex’s existing security systems served its purpose:

“Our priority is to safeguard customers’ funds and provide the best experience possible. We have many best practices in place to act on this priority, including the audit that identified the issue and automatically froze withdrawals within two minutes of its beginning.”

Transparency applauded

This type of scenario is almost unheard of in conventional trading circles, and the cryptocurrency space is no different. Nevertheless, Poloniex appeared to act both swiftly and openly in the course of action it chose to take. Investment specialist and market analyst Mati Greenspan told Cointelegraph that the circumstances of the event seem to have necessitated Poloniex’s actions:

“It’s certainly unconventional. I’ve never seen a platform have to resort to reversing trades before, and this definitely speaks to the severity of the error.”

The reversal of trades may have seemed to be an unorthodox solution to the error on Poloniex’s platform, but Greenspan played down the talk of the move setting a dangerous precedent for other trading platforms to follow, saying: “It seems like this was a difficult decision for Poloniex to take, and I applaud them for their transparency in the way they resolved the issue.”

Greenspan believes that complex technical errors need to be met with forward-thinking solutions. With that in mind, the analyst believes that any solution that serves the best interests of clients is difficult to criticize:

“In the technical world that we live in and specifically in the field of online trading, things happen. Bugs and errors are a fact of life and oftentimes, trades can be affected. The difference between good platforms and bad ones is the way that they handle it.”

In October 2019, Poloniex broke away from mobile payment giant Circle in order to better serve a global user base of traders. Circle had bought Poloniex for $400 million in February 2018.

Source: Cointelegraph https://cointelegraph.com/

Recent Posts

  • Xinghuo BIF and Zetrix Jointly Introduce Web3 Services: Blockchain Identity/Verifiable Credentials and Contract Signing – PR Newswire July 2, 2022
  • Hiring top crypto talent can be difficult, but it doesn’t have to be July 2, 2022
  • Blockchain with ‘Chinese characteristics’ is booming with Beijing’s blessing – South China Morning Post July 1, 2022
  • Why Blockchain-Based IDs Are Better Than Traditional IDs? – The Coin Republic July 1, 2022
  • Experts explain how music NFTs will enhance the connection between creators and fans July 1, 2022
  • Crypto Biz: Coinbase downgraded, 3AC deemed insolvent and Michael Saylor buys the dip July 1, 2022
  • DappRadar and LayerZero launch chain-agnostic staking token July 1, 2022
  • Voyager Digital freezes trading, deposits, withdrawals and rewards, blames 3AC default July 1, 2022
  • Bitcoin trader says expect more chop, downside, then sideways price action for BTC this summer July 1, 2022
  • Battle-hardened Ronin bridge reopens following $600M hack: Finance Redefined July 1, 2022
  • BlockFi announces deal with FTX US, including 'option to acquire' for $240M July 1, 2022
  • The Blockchain Interviews with Dan Weiskopf: Mike Novogratz – ETF Trends July 1, 2022
  • Price analysis 7/1: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, LEO, SHIB July 1, 2022
  • Ignite CEO announces departure after seven years July 1, 2022
  • Correction – CoinAgenda Announces First Round of Speakers for Ninth Annual Las Vegas and Sixth Annual Puerto Rico Web3, Blockchain and Crypto Conferences – GlobeNewswire July 1, 2022
  • June roundup: Who's hiring and who's firing in the crypto space July 1, 2022
  • Is HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd (HIVE) Stock About to Get Hot Friday? – InvestorsObserver July 1, 2022
  • June gloom takes on a new meaning in another 2022 down month July 1, 2022
  • DeFiance Media catches up with Bitcoin and blockchain thought leaders at GBC22 in Dubai – CoinGeek July 1, 2022
  • Bear market? “So what,” says World Chess Champion Garry Kasparov July 1, 2022
  • Tether continues to reduce commercial paper in sharp reduction since March July 1, 2022
  • Celsius' Options, Tether's Commercial Paper, Blockchain.com vs. Three Arrows + More News – Cryptonews July 1, 2022
  • Colombia Set To Employ Ripple's XRPL Blockchain for Land Registry – CoinQuora – Live Crypto News July 1, 2022
  • Argentina carries out crypto wallet seizures linked to tax delinquents July 1, 2022
  • Ashanti aims to bring women to Web3, says “owning is important” at NFT music meetup July 1, 2022
  • Experts weigh in on European Union’s MiCa crypto regulation July 1, 2022
  • TON Foundation launches Ethereum Name Service-like domain names July 1, 2022
  • What bear market? This token is quietly making new highs, up 300% against Bitcoin in 2022 July 1, 2022
  • Self-custody is key during extreme market conditions: Here's what experts say July 1, 2022
  • PYMNTS Intelligence: The Promise of Faster Transactions Using Blockchain Technology – PYMNTS.com July 1, 2022

Ad

Ad

©2022 o3n [ozone] blockchain layer | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com